mangin observant sa mga gakatabo sa pilipinas..be aware of the problems in the country para hnd kita ignorant kg hnd ta magpaloko sa mga corrupt officials and people

IS THERE ANY WATER-CRISIS SHOULD WE SWITCH FROM FOSSIL TO HYDROGEN FUEL ADDITIVES?

Despite the fact that nowadays we mostly employ fossil fuel to cover our
needs, a technology based on producing fuel on the expense of water supplies
will not worsen their general state is a legitimate question. John Turner deals
with this topic in an article published in Science magazine in August 2004.
The results of his research exceed any expectation: if all cars were to be
converted from gasoline powered vehicles to hydrogen powered ones, the
process of producing hydrogen out of water would require about 100 billion
gallons of water yearly. Amazing, isn’t it? However great this amount may
seem to us, you should know it is anyway smaller than the amount of water
necessary in producing gasoline, that is, 300 billions gallons each year.
.
Obviously, switching to hydrogen production is much more convenient and
efficient for two reasons: we get to use less water and save the perishable
resources that allowed us to produce gasoline until now. Yes, hydrogen is a
much more economical source, but the perspective of using it someday is
shadowed by the fact that that day is still far from us. Until the possibility of
actually using hydrogen becomes reality, most of us will use it as an auxiliary
source for our needs. Electricity generators based on hydrogen don’t
consume so much water, in fact they need very little of it. For instance, half
pint of mineral free water in your generator is just enough for 1000 miles.
Almost nothing, I may say, especially if you happen to live in a region where
rain is abundant. If you do live in such a region, you may just as well collect
the rain water and use it for your generator.
.
Pure gaseous hydrogen is famous for its high flammability. In appropriate
circumstances, hydrogen can ignite very quickly. Therefore, the concern many
people have with respect to the possibility of explosion provided that they
begin to use hydrogen as an additive to gasoline or as fuel cells is, again, an
explainable one. The tank where hydrogen is stored may be damaged any
time, so using hydrogen is, in their minds, similar to exposing themselves to
an unnecessary higher risk.
.
Some famous scientific episodes constantly feed this concern. For instance,
the fact that hydrogen was used in producing nuclear bombs makes them
think that employing this chemical element for their cars’ needs it’s like driving
around with a bomb in their trunk. But this is just a misunderstanding that has
to be clarified.
.
The main difference between the way hydrogen releases energy to be
delivered to our cars and the way it is employed in designing nuclear bombs is
that in the first case we are talking about a chemical reaction, whereas in the
second case the issue is nuclear fusion reaction. In a chemical reaction we
don’t tamper with nuclei, like we do in a nuclear explosion where the nuclei of
hydrogen fuse with the main two isotopes of hydrogen, namely, deuterium
and tritium, after these two collide with one another.
.
After fusion, of course, fission is needed in order to produce the actual
explosion, which means extremely high temperatures are involved and
required. This detail is not to be found in the way hydrogen is employed within
your car because your car, at its turn, does not meet those special
circumstances created in a bomb in order to release that tremendous amount
of energy that represents the explosion.
.
However, since I mentioned deuterium and tritium, I also have to say just to
calm your worries down, that in their absence no thermonuclear reaction is
possible. And in the hydrogen allowed for commercial use, may it be fuel or
otherwise, these two isotopes are not present. It is beyond any possibility to
have a nuclear reaction while innocently driving your car on hydrogen.
But nuclear bombs aside, there is another episode famous for its catastrophic
outcome, namely, the Hindenburg disaster that took place in 1937. This ship
called Hindenburg was designed to fly on hydrogen, since it was filled with
this gas and, at its turn, hydrogen could make the ship rise in the air.
Unfortunately, at a certain moment, the ship burned, and researchers today
still wander what the case might heave been.
.
However, more recent researches have proven that everything might have
begun from the skin of the ship which was impregnated with some highly
reactive substances. Of course, at a certain point the hydrogen contained in
the ship began to burn, but it’s important to know it was not the cause. It
burned as an effect of the already burning skin of the ship. And, again, the
skin must have started to burn because of a lightning. An explosion took
place, but it was subsequent to an initial fire.
.
Moreover, experiments have proven that the ship would have burned
regardless of what gas it contained once the skin began to burn. So, the truth
must be spoken: it’s not the hydrogen that is responsible for the Hindenburg
catastrophe.
.
A leaner burning process within a car is another reason for people to worry,
due to the possibility of generating exhaustion temperatures too high for
engines to resist. Such risks exist in the aviation domain, but pilots have the
possibility to monitor the exhaust gas temperature – or the EGT – so they are
able to control it. This risk is real in aviation because plains need all the
possible power in order to take off and to reach to the cruising altitude, in
which moment the fuel is replaced with a leaner one.
.
Just like a plane, a car needs more power when the engine is warming up or
when the car accelerates. The electronic fuel injection – or the EFI – allows
the car to benefit from this initial boost. Again, just like a plane, when the car
reaches its cruising state, by its engine control unit – ECU – it changes to a
new mixture which, in car values, is situated between 14.7 and 1. Between
these values, the mixture – I am talking about the mixture between air and
fuel – is perfect, allowing the best possible burning process.
.
Apart from an ideal premise for combustion, this mixture also generates the
highest values for temperature of combustion and exhaust gas temperature.
However, you may want to run on a leaner fuel. You may either increase the
amount of air or the amount of fuel, but in each case you will get lower
temperatures for both EGT and combustion.
.
As I said above, when the proportion of air to fuel is 14.7 to 1, you get the
highest EGT, but this means at the same time that your car is provided the
best power. You may enrich the mixture by adding more fuel, or you may
make it leaner, by increasing the amount of air, and both alternatives will
result in lower EGT.
.
Now I will show how this story is relevant to the hydrogen generators
question. How would you feel if you had the possibility to maintain a low EGT
and to get more power from the burning process? Well, the generated
hydrogen will lower this EGT, since I proved that adding air to the mixture
diminishes the exhaustion gas temperature. But at the same time it will supply
the car with more power than you would normally have to expect from a
leaner fuel.
.
Electrolysis of water is fundamental for all the technologies meant to produce
hydrogen, including for the cars that are not yet present in our lives. Yet,
electrolysis is fruitfully used today, and those who possess a basic knowledge
of chemistry realize how electrolysis happens. And even if hydrogen
generators are not available to us yet, electrolysis may be successfully used
to improve the fuel within your car’s performances with hydrogen. At the same
time, you have the possibility to control the delivery of hydrogen to the engine.
.
Particles released by car exhaust count as some of the most dangerous
substances both for humans and environment. Since we should care about
ourselves and the world we live in, we should at least try to understand how
this thing is possible, and do something if it is within our power.
Hydrocarbon fuels are the most dangerous of the most dangerous. Whatever
is released in the environment through exhaustion is actually represented by particles that are not burned during the burning process. If we were to use
hydrogen in order to improve combustion, no particles would remain and then
be released in the air or, in any case, fewer would manage to reach into the
atmosphere.
.
Because hydrogen is the smallest particle of all, it does two excellent things: it
enables burning because it increases molecular movement and collision.
Using hydrogen is extraordinary because it gives us the possibility to make
the best of the fuel we use, reducing waste and pollution at the same time.
And this is precisely how hydrogen diminishes pollutant emissions.
.
Global interest has been sparked about the possibility of someday owning
a hydrogen‐powered vehicle. All of the major vehicle manufacturers
are currently working on hydrogen powered cars, and some have even
unveiled their existing models at car shows and conventions across the
country. A few models are even on the roads today.
It is highly possible that hydrogen will be the fuel of choice for the future.
Some car manufacturers and other companies are focusing on building or
retrofitting internal combustion engines to run on hydrogen. Other hydrogen
cars unique use electric motors powered by hydrogen fuel cells. Inside the
hydrogen fuel cell a reaction occurs between hydrogen and the oxygen stored
in the cells. This reaction produces enough electricity to power the motor
without the need for any gasoline

Tito hugh, anu ang batayan mo sa mga gin post mo nga ja di, para maka kuon kaw nga [with all these news ba to?] maga uswag ang pilipinas?.. kun inog uswag ria ka pilipinas si sin-o lang nga pilipino ang maga uswag karia? di ba ang CEO at ang chairman at ang accountant or who ever nga marapit sa luwag lang?..

What will be the progress of those poor trabahadores? still trabahador man lang angud di ba?

Can we call it a progressive Philippines when, only those who are in a higher position can benefit and prosper?!!!

Iha ... it's really a SAD FACT that anywhere in the world ... in any countries ... there are people who belong to the "Privilege Few" ... some by birth-right ... some just self-made ... and that is why some has to graduate in the "University of Hard-Knock" just to be in the boat.
.
And for those who are unfortunate to be counted on the Privilege Few ... by all means ... keep striving. When digging a well ... one has no idea what deep is a good water ... but sometimes one may strike a Free-Flowing. That's how life is!

i knew you, you are a self made millionaire.. and i can still count myself as one of those privilege few i don't work yet, no salary, no income.. not unless ... i graduate any courses in any Screw University..

aww!!! life isn't balance enough is it?